Ladies and gents, I am posting my personal thoughts on what happened in Louisiana last night. So if you don't want to read them, feel free to skip this post. Being that people were killed trying to watch a movie, something I do several times a week, I feel I have to say something because it is bothering me.
I am saddened and heartbroken. My thoughts and best wishes go out to the family of those affected in the Lafayette shooting. The cinema is my home. I have met some of my best friends standing in lines for screenings. To me, movies are a family affair. I go to the movies with loved ones more often than not because to me, it is a religious experience. It is where I go to worship. There are good sermons, bad ones, and life changing moments that I see on screen that are reflections upon my life.
Last night, I first heard about the shooting standing in line for a screening of Hannibal at LACMA. I ignored it. I didn't want to think about it. I was there with three people that I love and to think that someone could cut us down doing something as mundane as going to the cinema is something that shocks me. Others hang out at bars, coffee shops, and malls. And unfortunately, killings have happened in these places. People who just look to hang out or have a good time. One of my friends is visiting from New York, so plenty of catching up has happened in those types of places. And to think that someone can go to a place like Walmart, buy a gun, and take out whatever anger they have on people in public places is terrifying.
Being afraid of death in places like that is akin to a cat being afraid of a bathtub full of water, so I do not let it stop me from doing the things that I want to do. But something must be done. That is why I am a supporter of gun control laws and bringing about change to the American gun nut world that is as disgusting as those that exploit children or those who they believe are inferior to them for whatever reasons. It is gratuitous violence that makes me want to turn my eye to the world and not be a part of it.
If you feel that guns are okay and that it's a matter of more security, and more concealed weapons or whatever, you can go ahead and unfriend me. I do not want that sort of thought process even on my news feeds and social media pages. It's thinking I don't need to be around. Again, I'm sorry for the long post, but I am so shocked that I don't know how else to express my feelings about what's occurred in a fashion that isn't anger. The cinema is my place of worship. I do not believe in God or religion, but I know there is a spiritual place due to the experiences I've had listening to music and watching films. I try to keep things light and fun on here and I am sorry for getting serious on all of you. I hope those people's deaths (including the shooter) were not in vain and this brings about change. I wish Love and mercy to you all.
Eduardo Victoria's HQ for thoughts, reviews, and recollections of all things film - also references to myself in third person.
Search This Blog
Friday, July 24, 2015
Tuesday, April 21, 2015
A GIRL WALKS HOME ALONE AT NIGHT
Throughout
the history of cinema, many great actors have personified death on film. First time directory Ana Lily Amirpour gives audiences one of the best
of recent memory in her quasi-Spaghetti Western homage, if David Lynch and David
Cronenberg could have a daughter, this would be the film that she would direct.
A Girl Walks Home Alone At Night
takes its time to get to know the characters, unnerve its audience, and uses its
black and white color palette to get under the audience’s skin. Sheila Vand
plays a vampire closer to Bela Lugosi’s Dracula than today’s more charming take
on vampiric characters.
Taking
place in the fictional Iranian town of Bad City, the film follows Arash (played
by Arash Marandi) as he copes with his father’s drug addiction. Hossein
(Marshall Manesh), a once charming man, has been reduced to a hunched over heroin addict who heckles local prostitute Atti (Mozhan Marnó) and owes money
to Saeed (Dominic Raines), the local pimp. An unnamed girl (Vand) comes into
everyone’s lives, as sudden and mysterious as the shadows haunting the night.
Every
inch of frame is utilized across the film’s 99-minute runtime. Filmed in and
around Bakersfield and Taft, California, there is a beautiful shot where the
Girl is following Atti home against a white wall, patterned by pillars in the
façade of the building. This film features some of the best cinematography of
the past year, particularly in scenes in which the Girl seems to materialize
from nowhere or follows people around at night. Her black burqa-like shawl
enveloping her just like darkness does to the world come sundown.
If
Amirpour’s film is guilty of anything, it is being too sincere. The cast of
relative unknowns does wonders for the story, never once breaking the spell of
watching characters on screen as opposed to actors on screen. Sheila Vand’s
take on the vampiric Girl character is hypnotizing. Her quasi-hipster, punk,
goth, place of residence is clad with posters of bands and artists from the
80s. She has little dialogue, but a powerful presence on screen. The Girl is a
force. We never find out where she comes from, why she is in Bad City, or what
her ultimate fate is. She is there and the characters must accept and live with
her, much like the idea of mortality and death, something the film does
explore, particularly with the scenes between Arash and Hossein, as the
relationship between father and son ultimately dies.
The
film has a lot to say about the image of masculinity, giving us two sides of a
coin with Saeed the drug dealing pimp and Arash, the honest and hard working
boy who had to save up to buy the car of his dreams. Though ultimately
resistant to both, the Girl takes an eventual liking to Arash after she encounters
him (dressed as Count Dracula for that matter) one night after a party. His
curiosity is sparked, leading to many questions and an interest in her, beyond
her looks. Saeed on the other hand pulls out every masculine cliché possible in
one of the film’s most memorable and humorous moments. She keeps an eye over
the men in the town, particularly the bad ones. Be it a young boy with
questionable habits or drugged out Hossein’s decline from fatherhood. The Girl
serves as a summation of the dark side of humanity in naivety, loneliness,
temptation, and of course, death.
First
time directory Ana Lily Amirpour has made a film that will have you thinking
about it long after viewing it. Whether it is the Ennio Morricone influenced
score or the fact that the dialogue is in Persian. This film challenges its
audiences from the long opening scene to the sparse dialogue. In that respect, A Girl Walks Home Alone At Night has
more in common with the Italian Western films of Sergio Leone and Sergio
Corbucci than contemporary its contemporary sparkly vampire romance pictures.
Not easy to swallow, but an experience unlike any other horror film out last
year, do what you can to see this film.
A Girl Walks Home Alone At Night is now available on VOD, DVD & Blu-Ray, and Netflix Instant Stream.
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
THE BABADOOK
I've seen many horror films in theaters. At this point, going to see one means keeping my guard up almost unwillingly. I watch the corners of frames for things lurking in the shadows, potential scares to be set up through tight angles, and things of that nature. Today's audiences have been treated to crappy horror movie after crappy horror movie in an endless string of films that write off their audiences as young or stupid. Perhaps the tides are starting to turn as The Conjuring was a massive success and did not write off its audience as dumb, however it relied on cheap scares.
The Babadook, the first film from writer director Jennifer Kent, does not think of its audience as stupid and as a matter of fact, the film can be interpreted one of two ways: literal and figurative. As if the styles of John Carpenter, David Lynch, and Tim Burton could have an offspring, the film is extremely visually interesting. Frankly, no one in their right minds would ever live in a house the way that actors Essie Davies and Noah Wiseman do. A perfect combination of all aspects of filmmaking and perhaps the most visually creepy monster in years create the perfect storm of terror, confusion, and emotion. The Babadook is one of the few genuinely frightening films I've ever seen and one of the best horror films ever made.
Amelia is a single mother living with her son Samuel. Her husband passed away 6 years earlier in a car accident that occurred on the way to the hospital when Amelia was to give birth to her only son. In the present day, her son's birthday serves only to bring her reminders of that terrible day. Samuel one day finds a book on his shelf he asks her to read. The book is titled "Mister Babadook." After reading the story to the boy, he begins to prepare for an imminent encounter with Mr. B. Amelia tries to talk some sense into her son, but soon begins to notice strange appearances and sounds that would suggest otherwise. A psychological and physical battle ensues between the mother and son and an enemy attacking them at their most vulnerable moment in their lives.
There is an old saying amongst filmmakers that you should never work with animals or children. Noah Wiseman as Samuel delivers an extremely powerful performance. At times, he is sensitive, vulnerable, and fearful, then turns in the opposite direction. Essie Davis is also spectacular as Amelia, showing a woman who is weathered and haunted by the constant memory of the death of her husband and birth of her child.
But perhaps the greatest strength of Dook is the quality that will divide viewers. The film greatly eschews the sense of reality being seen by the audience. Are we dealing with literal occurrences happening on screen or is there something deeper happening. The films ending will certainly have people talking for a while afterwards as to what they've just watched. But this is a good thing. Going back to my thoughts on studio horror pictures, all events in those types of films must be spelled out, dumbed down and conclude on a positive note. Babadook in many ways does not resolve, at least not in the way that we want it to.
As a horror fan, I will be the first to say that modern, big studio horror films suck. They flat out suck. It pains me to think that studios like Fox, Universal, and MGM were producing the best horror films ever made have been reduced to remakes. The Babadook proves that there is still hope in the world of cinematic terror and holy crap is it frightening. The film doesn’t rely on a single jump scare to frighten its audience and instead chooses to toy with them psychologically, just as it does with its protagonists. Beyond that terror, the film is about living with a memory that can haunt us every single day of our lives. Jennifer Kent’s film is dark, expressionist, and at times downright weird. It blurs the line between reality and fantasy to create not only one of the best films of the year, but one of the best horror films ever made.
The Babadook is now available on VOD, Blu-Ray & DVD (courtesy of the great folks at Scream Factory), and streaming on Netflix
There is an old saying amongst filmmakers that you should never work with animals or children. Noah Wiseman as Samuel delivers an extremely powerful performance. At times, he is sensitive, vulnerable, and fearful, then turns in the opposite direction. Essie Davis is also spectacular as Amelia, showing a woman who is weathered and haunted by the constant memory of the death of her husband and birth of her child.
But perhaps the greatest strength of Dook is the quality that will divide viewers. The film greatly eschews the sense of reality being seen by the audience. Are we dealing with literal occurrences happening on screen or is there something deeper happening. The films ending will certainly have people talking for a while afterwards as to what they've just watched. But this is a good thing. Going back to my thoughts on studio horror pictures, all events in those types of films must be spelled out, dumbed down and conclude on a positive note. Babadook in many ways does not resolve, at least not in the way that we want it to.
As a horror fan, I will be the first to say that modern, big studio horror films suck. They flat out suck. It pains me to think that studios like Fox, Universal, and MGM were producing the best horror films ever made have been reduced to remakes. The Babadook proves that there is still hope in the world of cinematic terror and holy crap is it frightening. The film doesn’t rely on a single jump scare to frighten its audience and instead chooses to toy with them psychologically, just as it does with its protagonists. Beyond that terror, the film is about living with a memory that can haunt us every single day of our lives. Jennifer Kent’s film is dark, expressionist, and at times downright weird. It blurs the line between reality and fantasy to create not only one of the best films of the year, but one of the best horror films ever made.
The Babadook is now available on VOD, Blu-Ray & DVD (courtesy of the great folks at Scream Factory), and streaming on Netflix
FURIOUS 7
The Fast and the
Furious movies have always been about family for those involved, both on
and off the set. Not just blood relatives, but friends who become so close that
they become more than just a friendship. The unthinkable happened when the
F&F family lost actor Paul Walker in a tragic car accident during the
production of Furious 7. What do you
do when one of the stars of the series is down and out? As they say, the show
must go on and the final result is a
fitting tribute and if need be, an end to the series.
The film
takes place immediately following the events of Fast & Furious 6. In retaliation for the death of one of his
own, Dominic Toretto (Vin Diesel) assembles his “quasi-A-Team” of drivers to
take down Deckard Shaw (Jason Statham), the brother of the previous movie’s big
bad, Owen. Receiving help from a mysterious man with all of the answers (played
by a very underused Kurt Russell), the team must recoup a tracking device known
as “God’s Eye.” Using it, they will be able to find Shaw and keep it from
falling into the wrong hands.
Diesel
mumbles his way through this film, irritating me to a level I didn’t think
possible, but he exudes the tough guy presence needed for a film about fast
cars and stealing stuff. Toretto is the star of this film, reducing Walker’s Brian
O’Connor to a supporting role. Being that this is a continuation of the
previous movie, the terrible amnesia story line with Letty (Michelle Rodriguez)
is still taking place in this installment. I repeat, what bogged down the last
film is still happening in this one. However, part of the salvation of Furious 7 is that the best characters
make a return and are the central focus of the film.
Statham’s Shaw
is under-developed and evil enough to fit right at home with the rest of the
brainless action. Frankly, we don’t need a backstory or good reason for him to
do what he’s doing. In a movie that has cars falling out of the back of a
plane, does a good motive really matter? The action
sequences are truly something to behold. A chase sequence across a two-lane
road throws everything including the “kitchen sink” into what’s likely to be
one of the best car chases of the year. Every character is utilized perfectly
but the movie doesn’t quite get up to that level again. Once you have cars
flying out of a plane, it’s hard to do something that’s more spectacular.
The big
question on everyone’s mind is how were the filmmakers able to work around the
death of one of their lead actors? Given the cards they were dealt, the crew
did an admirable job of trying to make a good movie while honoring Walker’s
memory. The “smoke and mirrors” used to achieve this become very obvious during
the film’s climax and in scenes involving Jordana Brewster. Most of her work
was done at the end of production and had to use Walker’s siblings as
stand-ins.
As fun as
this film is, it takes itself far too seriously. Dwayne Johnson gets a small
amount of screen time and Kurt Russell’s Mr. Nobody is contained within act II
of the film. Both actors clearly understand the subject matter and they are
arguably the most fun to watch on screen. Ironically enough, they are also the
two most underused characters in the cast. Luckily enough, Mr. Nobody steals
the show with his very vocal love for Belgian Ale.
I fear that
the magic captured in Fast 5 simply
can’t be repeated again. The series’ new direction of high-octane heist movie
was a thrilling and novel idea but seems to have been played out by stories
that take themselves, for the most part, too seriously. How much larger can
these movies get before they are ridiculous, even by their own genre’s standards?
Thursday, April 9, 2015
THE IMITATION GAME
Alan Turing was a man not many had heard of prior to director
Mortin Tyldum’s film The Imitation Game.
A team of code breakers, lead by the aforementioned mathematician, attempt to
break a Nazi code machine during World War II using their knowledge of numbers,
symbols, and patterns. However, it is Turing that realizes that technology is
at a cusp in which man cannot fight a machine. Instead, another piece of
technology must fight the battle.
Actor Benedict Cumberbatch as Turing delivers one of the best
performances of recent memory in what’s one of the best scripts made in the
last 10 years. A nearly two-hour runtime flies by thanks to the tight and
masterful script from 33-year-old scribe Graham Morton (who took home an Oscar
for his work).
Frequent flashbacks cut back to Turing’s time at a boarding
school in which he befriends a boy by the name of Christopher. As the
flashbacks reveal more and more about Turing, he inches closer and closer to
building a device that will help break a Nazi machine called “Enigma,” he faces
opposition from his team. Keira Knightly plays Joan Clarke, Turing’s go to
confidante for all information both professional and personal. The chemistry between
the two is so rich at times, you can cut tension with a knife and then turn
right around and bask in the warmth of their friendship.
In the past, we’ve seen the scenario of man vs. machine play
out in very physical ways with massive set pieces and explosions thanks to
action movies that give us material ways of seeing these scenarios play out. The Imitation Game pits man vs. machine
in an extremely intellectual fashion, yet never makes the audience feel stupid
by over simplifying what the team of code breakers is doing.
Composer Alexander Desplat adds a layer to the film that
won’t most notice. The score uses arpeggiating strings and rhythmic patterns
that are, quite frankly, machine-like more so than they are romantic. Each note
feels calculated during scenes of great technological achievement then turns to
a more “heart felt” approach when the Turing deals with his inner demons and
trials within his team.
The films cinematography has a classic, timeless look thanks
to Oscar Faura. 35mm film gives the outdoor scenes shot on location in
Bletchley Park a distinct look that can’t be replicated digitally and adds to
the overall timelessness of the film. The
Imitation Game is going to play well into the future come 20 or 80 years
from now. Not only does the film deal with the onslaught of powerful
technology, but also a social issue that many who are unfamiliar with Turing’s
story will be taken aback.
Ultimately, his story is one that ended tragically, but the
film chooses not to focus on that, but instead to celebrate his legacy created
by a specific moment in time. Where fellow Best Picture biopic American Sniper stumbles in it’s
unfocused and meandering story, The
Imitation Game is a pointed, tight, and extremely well done film. The film is now available on DVD and Blu-Ray.
Sunday, March 22, 2015
IT FOLLOWS
We are living in a sweet sweet golden era of horror. What a freaking time to be alive. The Babadook haunted our bedrooms last year, The Witch comes around later this year, but right now, Robert David Mitchell's extremely well crafted It Follows stalks our suburban lives. This movie gained a lot of buzz at Fantastic Fest last year when it was awarded Best Picture in the "Next Wave"Competition category.
This is the premise. It is simple yet at the same time, complex. The mechanics of it were a topic of discussion following the film on the ride home. Does the person who contracts the "disease" have to pass it along through genital contact? Who started it? Therein lies the super obvious moral of the story: it's a film about the spread of STD's, right? Maybe.
The film follows Jay Height (Maika Monroe), your average teenaged girl who is surrounded by friends, worried about school, and dating. She goes on a date with Hugh, a mysterious young man (Jake Weary) who chloroforms her then tires her up after a sexual encounter. She is told that something will begin to follow her. It will take the form of strangers, loved ones, family, friends, or some human form. Hugh tells her that the only way she will be able to get rid of it is to pass it along to someone else. But if Jay dies, it will go back to the person who had it prior.
This is the premise. It is simple yet at the same time, complex. The mechanics of it were a topic of discussion following the film on the ride home. Does the person who contracts the "disease" have to pass it along through genital contact? Who started it? Therein lies the super obvious moral of the story: it's a film about the spread of STD's, right? Maybe.
Director Robert David Mitchell has played the true meaning of the film pretty close to the chest not revealing what he is trying to say. At first, Jay, just as the audience, has no connection to the visions of those she sees following her. They are figures she doesn't recognize. Faces of past people who have fallen victim to "it" perhaps? Soon the faces become more familiar disorienting the audience and the characters on screen.
Maika Monroe leads one of the best ensemble casts in recent memory. Her performance is sincere and powerful as she needs to conjure virtually every emotion you can think of over the course of the film's runtime. Being an independent release, the unknown actors add to the overall experience. The actors never pull the audience out in a way that reminds us we're watching a film. Instead, they are part of the all out assault on the senses.
Adding to that assault is the electronic score by Disasterpeace. The music is so prominent and in your face at times, it seems as though the score itself is a character in the film. Pulsating electronic rhythms and sporadic tonalities create a dense pallet of sound for the ear to digest. The films' all out assault on the senses of the viewer never begin to overwhelm, but the film does become extremely heavy as act III approaches.
While horror films being churned out through the Hollywood studio system continue to prove that pop horror is in fact dead, no pun intended, indie films are offering a glimmer of hope to audiences. It Follows is a prime example of what can be achieved with a great script, top notch cast, and some vision. The major issue that puts major studio horror films to shame is a lack of vision. Directors for hire step in to direct traffic on a set, but often enough, don't have any real artistic vision. Thanks to director David Robert Mitchell, his vision has given us one of the best horror film of the last 15 years.
9/10
Maika Monroe leads one of the best ensemble casts in recent memory. Her performance is sincere and powerful as she needs to conjure virtually every emotion you can think of over the course of the film's runtime. Being an independent release, the unknown actors add to the overall experience. The actors never pull the audience out in a way that reminds us we're watching a film. Instead, they are part of the all out assault on the senses.
Adding to that assault is the electronic score by Disasterpeace. The music is so prominent and in your face at times, it seems as though the score itself is a character in the film. Pulsating electronic rhythms and sporadic tonalities create a dense pallet of sound for the ear to digest. The films' all out assault on the senses of the viewer never begin to overwhelm, but the film does become extremely heavy as act III approaches.
While horror films being churned out through the Hollywood studio system continue to prove that pop horror is in fact dead, no pun intended, indie films are offering a glimmer of hope to audiences. It Follows is a prime example of what can be achieved with a great script, top notch cast, and some vision. The major issue that puts major studio horror films to shame is a lack of vision. Directors for hire step in to direct traffic on a set, but often enough, don't have any real artistic vision. Thanks to director David Robert Mitchell, his vision has given us one of the best horror film of the last 15 years.
9/10
Monday, February 9, 2015
SELMA
Everyone recognizes the image of Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. standing in front of the Lincoln Memorial, delivering the legacy defining “I Have A Dream” speech or the photos of him standing at the front of a church delivering a sermon. History has given us an almost god-like figure in the way that he is spoken of in schools and countless other memorials in his dedication.
The greatest accomplishment of Ava Duvernay’s powerful film Selma is not its triumphant acting, cinematography or heart felt score – but the “deconstruction” of the saint-like image of Dr. King. What makes him like you or I? The answer has been right in front of us all along. He was a man. And just like any other man, he felt fear, anxiety, and great passion for assembling what eventually became the Selma Marches.
David Oyelowo delivers the performance of his career as Martin Luther King, already having received the Nobel Peace Prize, yet coming back to a racially divided Southern America shows his work is far from over. Duvernay often times places Oyelowo right in the center of the frame, drawing the eye straight to him, whether it be from directly above looking down at his head or from the point of view of people sitting in church pews.
The film’s strong suit is it’s cast. Selma has the best ensemble performance from any movie made in the last year. Tom Wilkinson paints President Lyndon Johnson not as a hero or as a villain, but as a man caught in the middle of a great struggle who is trying to be a good diplomat for what he believes to be the US Government’s best interests. Tim Roth’s take on Alabama Governor George Wallace is slimy and every bit unlikable as he came across in reality.
The daily struggle that comes with Dr. King’s work takes its toll on his marriage with Coretta (played by Carmen Ejogo), showing us a side of the man, not often discussed publicly. Paul Webb’s script does an incredible job of publicly showing us a man, who was as strong as a rock, but would turn right around and take frantic action as people coming from all over the country to participate in the Selma protests were targeted by attackers of the opposing side.
Without a doubt, this year’s Academy Award nominations were full of surprises, but Selma’s overall lack of presence among the nominees is downright shocking. Its serious subject matter begins to feel like “too much” for a film with little to no comedy by its third act. It is possible for a script to be too rich in its subject matter and as the film draws to a close, it shows. Perhaps the most important film made this side of the year 2010, Selma looks past the glorified images of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and examines what makes him like you and I: his humanity and the triumph, pain and passion that came with it.
10/10
The greatest accomplishment of Ava Duvernay’s powerful film Selma is not its triumphant acting, cinematography or heart felt score – but the “deconstruction” of the saint-like image of Dr. King. What makes him like you or I? The answer has been right in front of us all along. He was a man. And just like any other man, he felt fear, anxiety, and great passion for assembling what eventually became the Selma Marches.
David Oyelowo delivers the performance of his career as Martin Luther King, already having received the Nobel Peace Prize, yet coming back to a racially divided Southern America shows his work is far from over. Duvernay often times places Oyelowo right in the center of the frame, drawing the eye straight to him, whether it be from directly above looking down at his head or from the point of view of people sitting in church pews.
The film’s strong suit is it’s cast. Selma has the best ensemble performance from any movie made in the last year. Tom Wilkinson paints President Lyndon Johnson not as a hero or as a villain, but as a man caught in the middle of a great struggle who is trying to be a good diplomat for what he believes to be the US Government’s best interests. Tim Roth’s take on Alabama Governor George Wallace is slimy and every bit unlikable as he came across in reality.
The daily struggle that comes with Dr. King’s work takes its toll on his marriage with Coretta (played by Carmen Ejogo), showing us a side of the man, not often discussed publicly. Paul Webb’s script does an incredible job of publicly showing us a man, who was as strong as a rock, but would turn right around and take frantic action as people coming from all over the country to participate in the Selma protests were targeted by attackers of the opposing side.
Without a doubt, this year’s Academy Award nominations were full of surprises, but Selma’s overall lack of presence among the nominees is downright shocking. Its serious subject matter begins to feel like “too much” for a film with little to no comedy by its third act. It is possible for a script to be too rich in its subject matter and as the film draws to a close, it shows. Perhaps the most important film made this side of the year 2010, Selma looks past the glorified images of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and examines what makes him like you and I: his humanity and the triumph, pain and passion that came with it.
10/10
Friday, February 6, 2015
AMERICAN SNIPER
The following review attempts to leave out any bias for Chris Kyle, the US Military, the Left, the Right, and focus purely on the cinematic aspects of this film. You can read my personal thoughts on the controversy surrounding the film here.
The controversy surrounding American Sniper made me extremely curious
to check out Clint Eastwood’s latest film. The 84-year-old director scored the
biggest box office opening of his directorial career telling the story of Navy
SEAL Chris Kyle, the deadliest sniper in American Military history with 160
confirmed kills. He was tragically killed at a gun range helping a fellow
veteran suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. The film is based on his
book of the same name.
Alfred Hitchcock once said that if
you wanted to create suspense, an imperfect way to do so would be to have men
sitting around a table and then suddenly, the blast of a bomb having been
hidden beneath the table goes off. Instead, one must first see the bomb, then
have the men enter the room, proceed to talk for a while, then have the
explosion.
Eastwood employs the latter method
in the opening of his film, showing us the moral dilemma of Chris Kyle’s first
potential kill he is viewing from a perch above the action below: a child being
handed a grenade to use against oncoming American troops. The film never goes
any further than what is mentioned above to create true tension between Kyle
and a man known as Mustafa (played by Sammy Sheik), the Iraqi equivalent of the
titular American Sniper. He is a silent killing machine that
exists in the context of the film only to play spin the bullet (I’m not
kidding) and conveniently kill characters necessary for the plot to move
forward.
Mustafa is a prime example of the two dimensionality of the film’s
Middle Eastern protagonists. At this point in the film, I questioned whether this was done on purpose. I will never know what it's like to experience combat from the perspective of a Navy SEAL, but for those guys, it was probably a kill or be killed mentality that returned many to their families. It's rumored that when Steven Spielberg was attached to direct the project, he wanted to explore the psychological aspects of both the Chris Kyle and Mustafa, but this was unable to come to fruition due to time and budget constraints.
Sienna Miller delivers a great
performance as Taya, Kyle’s wife, with the amount of material she is given to
deal with. The only memorable moments in her performance are questioning why
the father of her children chooses to go off to Iraq and fight an enemy
thousands of miles away instead of building a relationship with his newborn
children. All attention is focused on Kyle
himself; after all it is his film. I found myself getting my hopes up for a
psychological exploration behind the moral questions raised by killing people
for his country.
Instead, a great performance from Bradley Cooper attempted to
compensate for very bland characters. There is no question about Cooper
owning this film from start to finish. For those who know what the true life
Chris Kyle looked and sounded like (the man appeared on a few talk shows to
promote his book when it was released in 2012), it’s a no brainer why the
Academy gave him his 3rd consecutive Oscar nomination for this
performance. His voice is pitched differently, the characterized Texan accent
is pretty darn good, and his usual trim physique is hidden beneath 225 pounds
of bulk Cooper put on for the role.
One of the most striking scenes
comes as a sandstorm looms on the horizon and Chris Kyle finally reaches the
breaking point of servitude. Eastwood manages to cleverly sneak in a nod to the
flashback within the opening of the film as he leaves behind one life for
another. An impending storm means impending doom, not only because Kyle and his team are surrounded by hostile enemies, but because it is in this inescapable fate that he realizes that he didn't have to put himself through this. It is the closest we get to a look into the man's psyche, something I was dying to see instead of an Iraqi fighting against, then helping, then turning back against US soldiers.
Instead of showing us a potentially heart breaking battle to return to
normalcy once back in the US, writer Jason Hall writes off Kyle’s PTSD as a
passing thought late in the third act. Again, I'm not kidding. Eastwood’s film strives for greatness,
but never truly achieves or clearly gets across its Pro-Veteran, anti-war statement due to its flimsy script.
6/10
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)